Remnant Saints Inter-Continental Congress Logo (Copyright)
Remnant Saints Inter-Continental Congress

Toward the Establishment of the Government of God on Earth

- Established December 31, 2001 -

Representative body for Patriot Saints and the International Patriot Alliance

 

Sister Sites
Patriot Saints.com
 - local gathering
Remnant Saints.com
 - survival
PatriotAlliance.org
 - international networking

Links

Contact

You are here: Remnant Saints > Inter-Continental Congress > Form of Government > Fundamental Rights > Edits > SDA March 4, 2002

Sterling D. Allan's March 4, 2002 Edit of:
-----------------------
The Fundamental Rights of Man, by Joel Skousen

Feb. 3, 2002 version
http://www.rsicc.org/Form/Fundamental_Rights/Archive/020203.htm 

KEY:
  • Inserted suggested text in Red
  • Comments in {curvy brackets} and green text.
  • deletion suggestions use strike-out font feature.

BEGIN TEXT


Condensed Listing

{Comment: We need the complete listing.}

{Comment: Body, Mind, Spirit would be a good way to organize the flow of content of this document, making sure that each facet is adequately covered.}

Proposed by Joel M. Skousen, member <http://www.rsicc.org/Members/index.html> of RSICC
<http://www.joelskousen.com/Philosophy/compact.html>
used with permission

1:

RIGHT TO LIFE

THE RIGHT TO LIFE, from conception to natural death, except as a consequence for a crime against the rights of others.

{Comment: need to be more specific about 'a crime' e.g. 'a capitol crime.'}

COROLLARY RIGHTS relating to man's innate life-related ability to think, believe, and reason:

{Comment: Needs to tie into the components of what makes us what we are: heart (feelings), head (thoughts), sinew (strength). You account for heart by "believe," and head by "think," and their relationship (though somewhat redundant with 'think') in the word "reason." Need to account for action -- the right to act (so long as such action does not impinge on the rights of another).}

A. The right of FREE THOUGHT and JUDGMENT on the individual worth of ideas, people and things.

{Comment: body, mind, and spirit. Ideas = mind; body = things; people = spirit?}

B. To BE FREE to BELIEVE according to each person's one's own conscience, without restriction, except when actions based upon that belief would violate the fundamental rights of others.

{Comment: Grammatically, "each person's" does not work. I don't believe according to each person's conscience. Last part of sentence should be a separate item, not part of same sentence. There is a big difference between holding a belief and acting on that belief.}

C. To be FREE to WORSHIP God according to the dictates of conscience.

{Comment: should be allowed to worship whatever, according to dictates of conscience.}

2:

LIBERTY

THE FREEDOM TO ACT WITHOUT EXTERNAL OR PRIOR RESTRAINT when those actions are not in direct and harmful conflict with the rights of others.

COROLLARY RIGHTS:

A. To be solely RESPONSIBLE for one's own health, life, education and safety.

{Comment: re: "health, life, education, safety." (1) is this list complete?, (2) is it in the right order?}

B. To engage in any ECONOMIC ACTIVITY desired as long as such activity does not involve compulsion upon others or the assistance of an enemy of these fundamental rights.

1. To engage in voluntary CONTRACTS, written or verbal, without restriction or regulation except where direct and harmful non-contractual consequences to others occur;

2. To unrestricted SELECTION and PURCHASE (from a willing seller) of all available goods and services desired,

3. To circulate and negotiate any tangible asset or sworn evidence thereof as money or a MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE as long as it is voluntarily accepted by another and fraud and misrepresentation are not present.

4. To PUBLISH any written, photographic, or electronic material, as long as others are not involuntarily exposed to such material on their own or contractual property.

5. The TO STATE ANY OPINION about another person or product without providing proof or evidence as long as such statements are labeled clearly as opinion.

C. To ASSOCIATE with other persons without coercion as long as that association is desired by all parties, does not constitute a direct and harmful threat to another's rights, and where such association is not in violation of the desires of the property owner.

{Comment: "is desired by all parties" is problematic. Very often one person might wish another of the assembly were not there.}

{2nd Comment: re: "the property owner." I realize you mean the property where such association is taking place, but perhaps you would explicitly state this so as to avoid a possible over-extension: one property owner impinging on events on another property not his own.}

1. Individuals may PEACEFULLY ASSEMBLE in groups without criminal or treasonous intent as long as private property rights and free movement on public property are not infringed or impeded.

{Comment: need to define "treasonous," lest thought crimes become subject to this stipulation.}

D. To DISASSOCIATE with other persons without public reason or justification

3:

OWNERSHIP

THE RIGHT TO OWN, DISPOSE OF, AND CONTROL ALL PROPERTY AND ASSETS which are earned by the honest fulfillment of voluntary contracts, received as a gift, inherited, or earned in proportion to the application of one's labor to unowned property.

{Comment: . . . so long as not guilty of impinging the rights of others.}

COROLLARY RIGHTS relating to or restricted to ownership and property rights:

A. TO BE FREE FROM BEING ACTED UPON or involuntarily influenced in a harmful manner, when on one's own or contractual property and not directly and harmfully affecting the rights of others.

{Comment: no comma between "manner" and "when."}

B. To exclude all persons not desired from one's own property.

C. To make any WRITTEN OR VERBAL EXPRESSION, on property within one's ownership or control, whether for personal or commercial intent.

D. To act in PRIVACY, within one's own or contractual property, free from search, seizure, regulation and internal surveillance except when acting to infringe upon another's rights.

4:

SELF-DEFENSE

TO DEFEND one's person, rights, and property[, family and community] against any overt and imminent threat, and to use the minimum, appropriate force required, of the alternatives immediately available at hand, to eliminate such threat, when no immediate recourse is available to assistance or constitutional adjudication.

5:

FAMILY RIGHTS

Families possess total SOVEREIGNTY OVER FAMILY AFFAIRS that do not infringe upon other's rights and that do not constitute an imminent threat to the life of the children therein

Children have the right to demand of their parents, minimum CARE, AND PROTECTION until reaching an ability, or desire to be self-sufficient--as long as the child is not acting in rebellion with the requirements of his parents which do not constitute physical cruelty, or gross negligence

{Comment: child must have adequate ability/responsibility for "desire" to be carried out.}

Parents have the right to ultimate RESPONSIBILITY and AUTHORITY for the health, education, and welfare of their dependent children without interference or prior restraint from government, except when proven guilty of gross physical cruelty, or gross negligence, as defined by constitutional law, and where the child does not willfully object to such interference.

{Comment: Is this list complete and in proper sequence: "health, education, welfare"?}

{2nd Comment: re: "as defined by constitutional law." The fundamental rights document needs to be the highest appeal, final authority. A constitutional law document is a more specific definition of parameters.}

{Comment: re: child objection -- needs to be willful, not manipulated.}

Sterling's edit completed March 4, 2002


See also


Page posted by SDA March 4, 2002
Last updated March 05, 2002
Hit Counter

 

www.rsicc.org

Copyright © 2001-2006

-- Toward the Ideal Form of Government --

SearchMission StatementNewStuffForumsContact
- - - - - - - -
Remnant SaintsInternational Patriot AlliancePatriot Saints